On the relevance of gravity model in the new institutional environment


  • Irena Jindřichovská Department of International Business, Metropolitan University Prague


gravity model, globalization, impediments to trade, nontariff barriers, institutional factors


International trade enables economies to gain specific advantages of trade. Theory of international trade is anchored on several key concepts. The first is the concept of comparative advantage. The size of international trade is frequently measured with the use of the gravity model. According to this model, countries trade with each other based on the size of their GDP and population. Another motivation supporting trade is the cultural affinity, institutional support and physical proximity. Deteriorating influence on the extent of mutual trade is traditionally expressed by increased geographical distance and trade impediments. In this paper we discuss the general validity of the model, taking in consideration new communication technology and new ways of transport and quality of institutions. We also discuss the issue of barriers to trade and we especially focus on the existing non-tariff barriers that are inhibiting the trade and we investigate how they can be included in to gravity model.


ALVAREZ-CUADRADO, F. - AMODIO, F. - POSCHKE, M. 2020. Selection and absolute advantage in farming and entrepreneurship.

BALDWIN, R. E., WYPLOSZ, CH. 2006. The economics of European integration. Vol. 2. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

BATRA, R. N. 1975. Production uncertainty and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 259-268.

BATRA, A. 2006. India’s global trade potential: The gravity model approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327-361.

BEGHIN, J. C. (Ed.). 2013. Non Tariff Measures with Market Imperfections: Trade and Welfare Implications. Emerald Group Publishing,

BEGUM, Z. 2020. Foreign Trade Finance and its Impact on International Trade: A Systematic Literature Review. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(10), 1323-1337.

BIALEK-JAWORSKA, A., GABRYELCZYK, R. 2016. Biotech spin-off business models for the internationalization strategy. Baltic Journal of Management, 11(4), 380-404. DOI: 10.1108/BJM-11-2015-0223

BIAŁEK-JAWORSKA, A., NEHREBECKA, N. 2016. The role of trade credit in business operations. Argumenta Oeconomica, 37(2), 189-231. DOI: 10.15611/aoe.2016.2.08

BRECHER, R. A., CHOUDHRI, E. U. 1993. Some empirical support for the Heckscher-Ohlin model of production. Canadian Journal of Economics, 272-285.

CASTRO-SANTOS, L. - DIAZ-CASAS, V. - BRAGE, R. Y. 2020. The importance of the activity costs in a shipyard: a case study for floating offshore wind platforms. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(1), 53-60.

CHEVASSUS-LOZZA, E. - LATOUCHE, K. - MAJKOVIČ, D. - UNGURU, M. 2008. The importance of EU-15 borders for CEECs agri-food exports: The role of tariffs and non-tariff measures in the pre-accession period. Food Policy, 33(6), 595-606

CHEN, N. 2004. Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter? Journal of international Economics, 63(1),93-118.

COOPER, R., KAPLAN, R. S. 1991. Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard business review, 69(3), 130-135.

DANIEL, B. - HOINARU, R. - MOCANU, M. - ROMAN, A. G. 2019, May. IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 829-839. Sciendo.

DIMAGGIO, P., POWELL, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

DIMAGGIO, P., POWELL, W. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

HELPMAN, E. 1981. International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlin-Heckscher- Ohlin approach. Journal of international economics, 11(3), 305-340.

HERMAN, P. 2020. A Pragmatic Approach to Estimating Non-discriminatory Non-tariff Trade Costs. U.S. International Trade Commission, Office of Economics, GTAP Conference, 2020

HOSŤOVECKÝ, M. - NOVÁK, M. - HORVÁTHOVÁ, Z. 2017. Problem- Based Learning: Serious Game in Science Education. In: 12th International Conference on e- Learning. The University of Central Florida: Orlando. s. 303-310. ISSN 2048-8882.

INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF NON-TARIFF MEASURES – 2019 version, [online], [accessed on 14.6.2020]. available at: <https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditctab2019d5_en.pdf>

JÁMBOR, A., GÁL, P. 2020. Determinants of regional trade agreements: Global evidence based on gravity models. Journal of International Studies, 13(1).

JAVED, I. - REHMAN, A. - NABI, I. - RAZZAQ, A. - SAQIB, R. - BAKHSH, A. - MOHIBULLAH, M. - LUQMAN, M. 2020. Performance and Macroeconomic Determinants of Basmati Rice Exports from Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 36(2), 617-624.

JINDŘICHOVSKÁ, I. – KUBÍČKOVÁ, D. – MOCANU, M. 2020 Case Study Analysis of Sustainability Reporting of an Agri-Food Giant. Sustainability; 12(11):4491

JINDŘICHOVSKÁ, I. - UGURLU, E. - THALASSINOS, E. I. 2020. Exploring the Trend of Czech FDIs and their Effect to Institutional Environment. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), Volume 8, Issue 1, 2020, Pages 94-108.

JONES, R. W. 1956. Factor proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 1-10.

KHEMANI, S. 2020. An Opportunity to Build Legitimacy and Trust in Public Institutions in the Time of COVID-19, Research and Policy Briefs 148256, The World Bank.

KRUGMAN, P. R. - MELITZ, M. J. - OBSTFELD, M. 2017. International trade: Theory and policy.

MACGREGOR PELIKÁNOVÁ, R. 2019. R&D expenditure and innovation in the EU and selected member states. JEMI – Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(1):13-33. MANKIW, N. G. 2020. Principles of economics. Cengage Learning

MARKS, S. 2020. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2019: Navigating Non-Tariff Measures towards Sustainable Development: New York: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2019.

MARKUSEN, J. R., VENABLES, A. J. 1986. Trade policy with increasing returns and imperfect competition: Contradictory results from competing assumptions.

MARTÍNEZ-ZARZOSO, I., NOWAK-LEHMANN, F. 2003. Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows. Journal of applied economics, 6(2), 291-316.

LEAMER, E. E. 1984. Sources of international comparative advantage: Theory and evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT press

ÖZCAN, A. 2020. Implementation of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing System in the Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from Turkey. In Management Accounting Standards for Sustainable Business Practices pp. 272-283. IGI Global.

PENDER, J. - HAZELL, P. - GARRETT, J. L. 2020. Reducing Poverty and Protecting the Environment. The overlooked potential of less-favoured lands Unfinished Agenda IFPRI publication (2002) for IFPRI’s

RICARDO, D. 1817. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1: Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Online Library of Liberty.

ROMAN, A. G. - MOCANU, M. - HOINARU, R. 2019. Disclosure style and its determinants in integrated reports. Sustainability, 11(7), 1960.

RUBÁČEK, F. 2017. Bezpečnost a důvěrnost dat. In Sborník příspěvků z konference a soutěže eLearning 2017. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus. ISBN 978-80-7435-691-9.

RUBÁČEK, F. - JINDŘICHOVSKÁ, I. - HORVÁTHOVÁ, Z. - ABRHÁM, J. 2020. Accessibility of websites of the European national tourism boards. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8 (2). ISSN: 22414754.

SAMUELSON, P 1971 “Ohlin Was Right,” Swedish Journal of Economics 73. 1971, pp. 365–384;

SUN, C. 2020. Multinational production with non-neutral technologies. Journal of International Economics, 103294.

XU, S. - NIU, J. - CAI, X. 2020. Optimize Logistics cost model for shared logistics platform based on time-driven activity-based costing. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 1437, No. 1, p. 012115. IOP Publishing.

TAI, S. H. 2020. The Quality of Institutions and the Relationship between International Trade and Inequality. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(3).

TINBERGEN, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

THE TREATY OF LISBON. 2007. [online], [accessed on 14.6.2020]. available at: <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the-treaty-of-lisbon>

TUCKER D. 2020. Limits and difference: Preconditions for comparative advantage. Journal of International Management Studies, 20(1).

UGURLU, E., JINDRICHOVSKA, I. 2019. Estimating Gravity Model in the Czech Republic: Empirical Study of Impact of IFRS on Czech International Trade, European Research Studies Journal Volume XXII Issue 2, 265-281.

WEBB, M. - STRUTT, A. - GIBSON, J. - WALMSLEY, T. 2020. Modelling the impact of non-tariff measures on supply chains in ASEAN. The World Economy

YADAV, P. 2020. Globalization and India’s international trade: does distance still matter?. GeoJournal, 1-15.



How to Cite

Jindřichovská, I. (2020). On the relevance of gravity model in the new institutional environment. Slovak Journal of Public Policy and Public Administration, 7(1). Retrieved from https://sjpppa.fsvucm.sk/index.php/journal/article/view/98