Action control system and new public management in public sector organization: an in-depth case study

Authors

  • Anup Chowdhury Faculty of Business and Economics, East West University
  • Nikhil Chandra Shil Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business and Economics, East West University

Keywords:

Management control system, action control system, new public management, public sector organization, Australia

Abstract

This study is about the exploration of action control system, a component of management control system in the context of New Public Management (NPM) initiatives. The NPM initiatives created the changes to the structure and processes of public sector organisations with the objective of getting them to run better. A Government Department in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) has been adopted as a field of investigation for the purpose of this exploration. This study investigated how the action control technologies have been implicated in the organisational environment within this department. Considering management control systems are socially constructed Giddens’ structuration theory is adopted in this study to obtain a better understanding of human actions and to explore how these control systems are implicated in the wider social context through time. This study used a single case with strong naturalistic and interpretive interests. Since the nature of the present research is explorative and the focus of this research is to study in depth of a particular phenomenon qualitative research methodology has been chosen to obtain a better understanding of the phenomenon. The study revealed that a number of action control tools have been introduced to guide the employees and to act for the best interest of the organisation.

References

ACT Government, Privacy Act, ACT, Australia, 1988.

ACT Government, The Public Interest Disclosure Act, ACT, Australia, 1994.

ACT Government, ACT Public Service: Customer Services Standards, ACT, Australia, 1999.

ACT Government, Public Sector Management ACT 1994, A1994-37, Republication No. 24, ACT, Australia, 2007.

ALAM, M. and NANDAN, R., Management Control Systems and Public Sector Reform: A Fijian Case Study, Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 2008, vol. 14, no.1, p.1-28.

ANSARI, S. L., An integrated approach to control system design’, Accounting, Organisations and Society, 1977, vol. 2, p. 101-112.

ANTHONY, R. N. and GOVINDARAJAN, V., Management Control Systems, McGraw Hill Irwin, Boston Mass, 2007.

BALDRY, D., The evaluation of risk management in public sector capital projects, International Journal of Project Management, 1998, vol. 16, issue 1, p. 35-41.

BREWER, B., Citizen or customer? Complaints handling in the public sector, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2007, vol. 73, no. 4, p. 549-556

BARRETT, G., MURPHY, S. and MILLER, R., Financial Management reform, In Stewart, J. (ed.), From Hawke to Keating- Australian Commonwealth Administration 1990-1993, Centre for Research in Public Sector Management, University of Canberra & Royal Institute of Public Administration, Australia, 1994, p. 49-68.

BARETT, P. G., Public sector risk-taking – thinking entrepreneurially (extracts) In Guthrie, J. Parker, L. and Shand, D. (eds.), The Public Sector: Contemporary Readings in Accounting and Auditing, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, Sydney, 1990, p. 95-111.

BERRY, A. J., COAD, A. F., HARRIS, E. P., OTLEY, D. T., and STRINGER, C., Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature, The British Accounting Review, 2009, vol. 41, p. 2- 20.

BORINS, S., Innovation in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D. C, 2008.

BOURGON, J., The Future of Public Service: A Search for a New Balance, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2008, vol. 67, p. 390-404.

BROADBENT, J. and GUTHRIE, J., Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent “Alternative” Accounting Research, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1992, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 3-29.

BROWN, K., WATERHOUSE, J. and FLYNN, C., Change management practices- Is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies? The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2003, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 230-241.

BURTON, J. and BROEK, D. V., Accountable and countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work, British Journal of social work, 2009, vol. 39, issue 7, p. 1326-1342.

CORBETT, D, Australian Public Sector Management, Allen & Unwin, NSW, 1996.

CORE, P., Accountability in the Public Sector, in Guthrie, J. (ed), The Australian Public Sector: Pathways to Changes in the 1990s, IIR Conferences Pty Ltd., NSW, 1993, p. 48-52.

COVALESKI, M. A. and DIRSMITH, M. W., Dialectic Tension, Double Reflexivity and the Everyday Accounting Researcher: On Using Qualitative Methods, Accounting,

Organizations and Society, 1990, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 543-573.

COVALESKI, M. A., DIRSMITH, M. W. and SAMUEL, S., Managerial Accounting Research: The Contributions of Organizational and Sociological Theory, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 1996, vol. 8, p. 1-35.

CZARNIAWSKA-JOERGES, B., Dynamics of Organizational Control: The Case of Berol Kemi AB, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1988, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 415-430.

DHCS, Risk Management Framework, ACT, Australia, 2007.

DHCS, Quarterly Risk Management Profile, January-March, ACT, Australia, 2008.

DHCS, Ministerial and Assembly Guidelines and Procedures, ACT, Australia, 2008a.

FARNETI, F. and GUTHRIE, J., Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report, Accounting Forum, 2009, vol. 33, issue 2, p. 89-98.

GEERTZ, C., The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York, 1973.

GENDRON, Y., COOPER, D. J., and TOWNLEY, B., In the name of accountability: State auditing, independence and new public management, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2001, vol.14, no. 3, p. 278-310.

GIDDENS, A., New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1976.

GIDDENS, A., Central Problems in Social Theory, The Macmillan Press Ltd., London, 1979.

GIDDENS, A., The Constitution of Society: outline of the theory of structuration, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.

GROOT, T. and MERCHANT, K. A., Control of international joint ventures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2000, vol. 25, p. 579-607.

GUBA, E. G. and LINCOLN, Y. S., Effective evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1981.

GUTHRIE, J. and FARNETI, F., GRI Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organizations, Public Money & Management, 2008, vol. 28, issue 6 ,p. 361-366.

HENRI, J.-F., Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2006, vol. 31, issue 6, p. 529-558.

HOQUE, Z., A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organizational performance, International Business Review, 2004, vol. 13, issue 4, p. 485-502.

HOQUE, Z. and MOLL, J., Public sector reform- Implications for accounting, accountability and performance of state-owned entities – an Australian perspective, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2001, vol.14, no. 4, p. 304-326.

IRVINE, H. and GAFFIKIN, M., Methodological insights: Getting in, getting on and getting out: reflections on a qualitative research project, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2006, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 115-145.

KELLY, M. and ALAM, M., Management Accounting and the Stakeholder Value model, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 2008, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 75-86.

KENNEDY, M., Legislation for Ethical and Accountable Management- A Commonwealth Perspective, In Guthrie, J. (ed), Making the Australian Public Sector Count in the 1990s, IIR Conferences Pty Ltd., NSW, 1995, p. 19-23.

KINCHIN, N., More than Writing on a Wall: Evaluating the Role that Codes of Ethics Play securing Accountability of Public Sector Decision-Makers, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2008, vol. 66, p. 112-120.

LEE, J., Preparing Performance Information in the Public Sector: An Australian Perspective, Financial Accountability & Management, 2008, vol. 24, issue 2, p. 117-149.

LAWRENCE, S., ALAM, M., NORTHCOTT, D. and LOWE, T., Accounting systems and systems of accountability in the New Zealand health sector, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1997, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 665-683.

LAWRENCE, S. and ALAM, M., Disability support services in a liberalized economy – A NZ case study, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2000, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 186-205.

LODH, S. C. and GAFFKIN, M. J. R., Critical Studies in Accounting Research, Rationality and Habermas: A Methodological Reflection, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1997, vol. 8, issue 5, p. 433-474.

MALMI, T. and BROWN, D. A., Management control systems as a package-opportunities, challenges and research direction, Management Accounting Research, 2008, vol. 19, issue 4, p. 287-300.

MASON, J., Qualitative Researching, Sage Publications Ltd., London, 2002.

MERCHANT, K. A., The Control Function of Management, Sloan Management Review, 1982, Summer, p. 43- 55.

MERCHANT, K. A. and VAN DER STEDE, W. A., Management Control Systems, Pearson Education Limited, 2012.

MERRIAM, S. B., Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, Jossey-Bass, California, 2009.

MILES, M. B. and HUBERMAN, A. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, London, 1994.

MULGAN, R., Comparing Accountability in the Public and Private Sectors, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2000, vol. 59, issue 1, p. 87-97.

MURRAY, A., Review of Operation Sunlight: Overhauling Budgetary Transparency, June, Canberra, 2008.

NAGY, S., HESSE-BIBER, LEAVY, P., The Practice of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications Inc., London, 2010.

NEELY, A., GREGORY, M. and PLATTS, K., Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005, vol. 25, issue 12, p. 1228-1263.

NEIMARK, M. and TINKER, T., The Social Construction of Management Control Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1986, vol. 11, no. 4/5, p. 369-395.

NØRREKLIT, H., The balance on the balanced scorecard a critical analysis of some of its assumptions, Management Accounting Research, 2000, vol. 11, issue 1, p. 65-88.

OTLEY, D., Management control and performance management: Whence and whither? The British Accounting Review, 2003, vol. 35, p. 309-326.

PATTON, M. Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 2002.

PIOTROWSKI, S. J. and ROSENBLOOM, D. H., Non mission-Based Values in Results-Oriented Public Management: The Case of Freedom of Information, Public Administration Review, 2002, vol. 62, p. 643-657.

QUATTRONE, P. and HOPPER, T., A time space odyssey: management control systems in two multinational organizations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2005, vol. 30, issue 7-8, p. 735-764.

ROBERTS, A. S., Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the weakening of Freedom of Information Law, Public Administration Review, 2000, vol. 60, p. 308-320.

RYAN, B., SCAPENS, R.W. and THEOBALD, M., Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting, Academic Press Limited, London, 1992.

SIMONS, R., Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995.

STEANE, P., Public Management Reforms in Australia and New Zealand: A potpourri overview of the past decade, Public Management Review, 2008, vol. 10, issue 4, p. 453-465.

TANNER, L., Review of Operation Sunlight - Overhauling Budgetary Transparency, December, Canberra, 2008.

WARD, M. A. and MITCHELL, S., A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives, Government Information Quarterly, 2004, vol. 21, issue 3, p. 284-304.

WEBB, W., Public management reform and the management of ethics: Incompatible ideals for the developing state? International Journal of public sector management, 2010, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 669-684.

ZAWAWI, N. H. M. and HOQUE, Z., Research in management accounting innovations: An overview of its recent development, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 2010, vol. 7, issue 4, p. 505-568.

Published

2019-07-01

How to Cite

Chowdhury, A., & Shil, N. C. (2019). Action control system and new public management in public sector organization: an in-depth case study. Slovak Journal of Public Policy and Public Administration, 6(1). Retrieved from https://sjpppa.fsvucm.sk/index.php/journal/article/view/88